Casieria casieri

Casieria casieri

(Cappetta, 1976)

Common name Catshark
Fossil group Sharks & Rays
Order Carcharhiniformes
Family Scyliorhinidae
Genus Casieria
Taxonomic status Accepted
Geological age Ypresian
Recorded rarity by age
Ypresian: Not yet established
View age-specific evidence and explanation
AgeRecorded OccurrencesLocalitiesRarity
Ypresian33Not yet established

These counts describe published LBPS Occurrence records with directly assigned, unambiguous geological-unit mappings—not specimen abundance. Records at restricted Localities and ambiguous or unsupported ages are excluded. Species-level age labels are not used as proof of an age-specific Occurrence.

Specimen-based rarity requires comparable, correctly identified physical fossils, geological provenance and publication permissions. It does not estimate your chance of finding a fossil or collecting access.

Quick Identification

What to look for: A three-pointed tooth: one tall central cusp with one long, sharp side point on each side. On complete teeth, the exposed side points can reach about half the height of the main cusp.

Useful check: Turn the tooth over. Look for strong lengthwise folds on both faces of the crown, sometimes reaching almost to the tip, and a broad root divided by a deep central groove.

How to compare: The relatively tall paired side points help separate complete teeth from Scyliorhinus woodwardi, whose side points are shorter. Consider the complete crown and root together.

Be careful: If one or both side points are broken away or the folds are heavily worn, an isolated tooth may not be identifiable to this species with confidence.

Summary

One of the most distinctive features of Casieria casieri is the unusual shape of its teeth. Each has a tall central point flanked by two long, sharp side points, giving it the appearance of a miniature three-pronged crown. The side points can reach about half the height of the main one, while strong folds run up both faces of the tooth. These are small fossils, but an intact example is quite unlike the simple pointed teeth of many other sharks.

The species was first described from the London Clay of Essex in 1976, under the name Scyliorhinus casieri. Its fossil record also has a less familiar connection with the Netherlands. In 1985, scientists examining shark and ray teeth recovered from boreholes through the buried Dongen Formation recorded specimens under that earlier name. Unlike the London Clay exposures of the British coast, these Dutch Eocene deposits are hidden beneath the surface and can only be studied through drilling.

The shape of the teeth also became important in later research. When scientists described Casieria maghrebiana from Morocco in 1997, they recognised it as a different species partly because its side points were proportionally shorter. Such small differences can be enough to separate extinct sharks whose skeletons are otherwise unknown.

There is still much we cannot say about C. casieri. Its adult size, exact diet and appearance remain uncertain. But its teeth provide a particularly useful reminder for fossil collectors: a broken or heavily worn specimen may have lost precisely the small details that distinguish one species from another. In this shark’s case, those two sharp side points can make all the difference.

Diagnostic Features

  • One large pointed lateral cusplet on each side of the central cusp.
  • Strong vertical folds on both crown faces, sometimes extending nearly to the cusp tip.
  • Central cusp tall, strong and sharply pointed.
  • Cutting edges smooth and unserrated.
  • Root broad and relatively flat, with a large deep central groove.

Fossil Details

Preservation
Small lateral cusplets and fine basal crown detail are readily lost through wear. A tooth missing one or both cusplets can overlap with other London Clay catsharks, so incomplete material should be identified conservatively.

Similar Species

Recorded Fossil Sites

Diagnostic Sources

  • Cappetta, H. (1976). Sélaciens nouveaux du London Clay de l’Essex (Yprésien du Bassin de Londres). Geobios, 9(5), 551–575 View reference
  • Noubhani, A.; Cappetta, H. (1997). Les Orectolobiformes, Carcharhiniformes et Myliobatiformes (Elasmobranchii, Neoselachii) des Bassins à phosphate du Maroc (Maastrichtien–Lutétien basal): systématique, biostratigraphie, évolution et dynamique des faunes. Palaeo Ichthyologica, 8, 1–327 View reference

References

  • Bor, T.J. (1985). Elasmobranch teeth (Vertebrata, Pisces) from the Dongen Formation (Eocene) in the Netherlands. Mededelingen van de Werkgroep voor Tertiaire en Kwartaire Geologie, 22(2), 73–122 View reference
  • Cappetta, H. (1976). Sélaciens nouveaux du London Clay de l’Essex (Yprésien du Bassin de Londres). Geobios, 9(5), 551–575 View reference
  • Noubhani, A.; Cappetta, H. (1997). Les Orectolobiformes, Carcharhiniformes et Myliobatiformes (Elasmobranchii, Neoselachii) des Bassins à phosphate du Maroc (Maastrichtien–Lutétien basal): systématique, biostratigraphie, évolution et dynamique des faunes. Palaeo Ichthyologica, 8, 1–327 View reference
  • Rayner, D.; Mitchell, T.; Rayner, M. (2009). London Clay Fossils of Kent and Essex. 228 pp.. Medway Fossil and Mineral Society, Rochester, Kent View reference
Last Reviewed
17 August 2026 Reviewed by Sam Harris