Amylodon eocenica

Amylodon eocenica

(Woodward & White, 1930)

Common name Long nosed chimaeroid
Fossil group Sharks & Rays
Order Chimaeriformes
Family Rhinochimaeridae
Genus Amylodon
Taxonomic status Accepted
Geological age Ypresian

Summary

Amylodon eocenica was an early Eocene chimaeroid, a holocephalan relative of living ratfishes and long nosed chimaeras rather than a shark or ray. Its rhinochimaerid placement provides the best guide to its general body plan, while the known fossils are mainly dental plates. Chimaeroids do not continually replace rows of individual teeth; instead they possess persistent plates that grow with the animal and contain dense tritor tissue.

Those tooth plates formed durable crushing and shearing surfaces. They indicate feeding on resistant food and make a demersal diet including hard bodied invertebrates a reasonable functional inference, although the exact prey of A. eocenica is not known directly. The plates record a specialised feeding system very different from the piercing dentitions of the lamniform sharks that lived alongside Palaeogene chimaeroids.

Quick Identification

Look for: a persistent chimaeroid tooth plate rather than an individual rooted tooth, with hypermineralised tritor areas forming part of the crushing surface. Preserve the plate margins, curvature and tritor arrangement because these establish plate position. Do not identify an isolated mandibular fragment as Amylodon eocenica solely from size or age.

Diagnostic Features

  • Securely attributed material is based principally on palatine tooth plates rather than isolated rooted teeth.
  • Palatine plates lack the distinct middle tritor present in several other chimaeroid plate patterns.
  • The form and position of the posterior inner tritor are important for separating A. eocenica from other Amylodon species.
  • Species identification requires preservation of enough plate margin and tritor layout to establish anatomical position.
  • A mandibular plate with a large undivided median tritor formerly assigned to A. eocenica is excluded from the modern species concept.

Fossil Details

Typical size
Centimetre scale tooth plates; the known material is too incomplete and position dependent for a reliable species wide numerical range.
Fossil material
Tooth Plate
Preservation
Dental plates often survive as broken tritor bearing fragments with incomplete margins. Such pieces may be confidently recognised as chimaeroid material while remaining unidentifiable to species. Mandibular fragments require particular caution because historical material once assigned to A. eocenica has been removed from the species concept.

Similar Species

Recorded Fossil Sites

Synonyms & Previous Names

Chimaera eocenica

References

  • Ward, D.J. (1973). The English Palaeogene Chimaeroid fishes. Proceedings of the Geologists' Association, 84(3), 315–330 View reference
  • Ward, D.J. (1980). The distribution of sharks, rays and chimaeroids in the English Palaeogene. Tertiary Research, 3(1), 13–19 View reference
  • Woodward, A.S.; White, E.I. (1930). On Some New Chimaeroid Fishes from Tertiary Formations. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, 6(35), 577–582 View reference
Last Reviewed
21 August 2026 Reviewed by Sam Harris