Hypolophodon sylvestris

Hypolophodon sylvestris

(White, 1931)

Common name Stingray
Fossil group Sharks & Rays
Order Myliobatiformes
Family Dasyatidae
Genus Hypolophodon
Taxonomic status Accepted
Geological age Thanetian and Ypresian

Summary

Hypolophodon sylvestris was an early Eocene myliobatiform ray belonging to the stingray lineage. Its flattened disc shaped body and swimming by undulation of the enlarged pectoral fins are inferred from its batoid relationships, because the species is usually known from isolated hard parts rather than complete skeletons. The low pavement like dentition is direct evidence of a feeding system very different from the piercing teeth of contemporary sharks.

The broad low crowns were suited to gripping and processing food taken on or close to the seabed. A diet including small molluscs, crustaceans and other benthic invertebrates is therefore a reasonable functional inference, although direct gut contents are not known. The species was probably a demersal ray that foraged over soft or mixed substrates rather than an open water pursuit predator.

Fossils consist mainly of tiny isolated teeth and characteristic dermal denticles or tubercles. Tooth shape varies across the dental pavement, so median and lateral positions should not be expected to have identical proportions. Published teeth are only a few millimetres across, making well preserved crown margins and roots particularly important.

Quick Identification

Look for: a very small, low ray tooth with a broad crown that overhangs a narrower root, rather than a tall shark like cusp. Median and lateral teeth vary in width within the dental pavement. Enlarged dermal tubercles may show radiating grooves around a raised central spine; worn pieces lacking these structures should be identified more cautiously.

Diagnostic Features

  • Tooth crown is low and broader than the supporting root.
  • Crown margins overhang the root and slope inward towards it.
  • Median and lateral tooth positions differ in width within the pavement dentition.
  • Root is comparatively narrow and recessed beneath the crown.
  • Enlarged dermal tubercles bear radiating grooves around an elevated central spine.

Fossil Details

Typical size
Teeth are typically only a few millimetres across; published examples are about 4 mm in greatest dimension.
Fossil material
Tooth, Dermal Denticle
Preservation
The small teeth are vulnerable to chipped crown margins and root loss, which can remove the overhang needed for identification. Dermal tubercle spines are also readily broken. Smooth fragments without the root or diagnostic tubercle sculpture should remain at a broader batoid identification.

Similar Species

Recorded Fossil Sites

Synonyms & Previous Names

Hypolophus sylvestris; Dasyatis sylvestris

References

  • Dineley, D. & Metcalf, S. (1999). Fossil Fishes of Great Britain. Geological Conservation Review Series, 675 pp.. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough View reference
  • Reinecke, T.; Mollen, F.H.; Gijsen, B.; D’Haeze, B.; Hoedemakers, K. (2024). Batomorphs (Elasmobranchii: Rhinopristiformes, Rajiformes, Torpediniformes, Myliobatiformes) of the middle to late Ypresian, early Eocene, in the Anglo-Belgian Basin (south-western North Sea Basin) – a review and description of new taxa. Palaeontos, 35, 1–172 View reference
  • Ward, D.J. (1978). The Lower London Tertiary (Palaeocene) succession of Herne Bay, Kent. Report of the Institute of Geological Sciences. Institute of Geological Sciences View reference
  • Ward, D.J. (1980). The distribution of sharks, rays and chimaeroids in the English Palaeogene. Tertiary Research, 3(1), 13–19 View reference
  • White, E.I. (1931). The vertebrate faunas of the English Eocene. I. From the Thanet Sands to the Basement Bed of the London Clay. 121 pp.. British Museum (Natural History), London View reference
Last Reviewed
21 August 2026 Reviewed by Sam Harris