Icacinicarya jenkinsi
Icacinicarya jenkinsi
View age-specific evidence and explanation
There are no currently eligible, unambiguously age-indexed published Occurrences for this Species. This does not indicate absence or rarity.
These counts describe published LBPS Occurrence records with directly assigned, unambiguous geological-unit mappings—not specimen abundance. Records at restricted Localities and ambiguous or unsupported ages are excluded. Species-level age labels are not used as proof of an age-specific Occurrence.
Specimen-based rarity requires comparable, correctly identified physical fossils, geological provenance and publication permissions. It does not estimate your chance of finding a fossil or collecting access.
Quick Identification
Look for: a small slender locule cast with regularly spaced broad conical pits/marks made by tubercles that projected into the fruit cavity, together with a distinctly papillate inner surface. The missing outer endocarp prevents secure transfer to Miquelia.
Summary
Icacinicarya jenkinsi is known from a small, slender fruit cavity whose walls carried unusually large inward-projecting structures. The locule cast records broad conical tubercles, apparently arranged fairly regularly and probably in longitudinal series. Between them the inner wall is distinctly papillate. This combination gives the species a very different internal texture from ordinary ridged Icacinicarya stones.
Modern authors noted a strong resemblance to fruits of the living genus Miquelia, but the external endocarp surface is not preserved well enough to make a formal transfer. The species therefore remains in Icacinicarya. This is a useful example of a fossil whose closest biological comparison is suggestive but incomplete: the reproductive anatomy indicates an icacinaceous lineage and possible Miquelia relationship, while the whole-plant habit and exact generic placement remain inference.
Diagnostic Features
- Known locule cast is slender and small, around 10.5 mm long.
- Broad conical tubercles projected into the locule and leave conspicuous rounded impressions on the cast.
- Tubercles are relatively evenly spaced and show a tendency toward longitudinal arrangement.
- Locule lining is distinctly and finely papillate.
- External endocarp surface is not adequately preserved, preventing confirmation of the otherwise strong Miquelia-like morphology.
Fossil Details
Similar Species
Recorded Fossil Sites
No fossil-site occurrences have yet been recorded for this species.
References
- Eleanor Mary Reid; Marjorie Elizabeth Jane Chandler. (1933). The London Clay Flora. . British Museum (Natural History), London View reference
- Gregory W. Stull; Neil F. Adams; Steven R. Manchester; Dan Sykes; Margaret E. Collinson. (2016). Revision of Icacinaceae from the Early Eocene London Clay flora based on X-ray micro-CT. Botany, 94(9), 713–745 View reference
- Kathleen B. Pigg; Steven R. Manchester; Melanie L. DeVore. (2008). Fruits of Icacinaceae (Tribe Iodeae) from the Late Paleocene of western North America. American Journal of Botany, 95(7), 824–832 View reference
