Physogaleus secundus
Physogaleus secundus
Summary
Physogaleus secundus was a small requiem-shark relative with a low cutting dentition. It belonged to the early carcharhinid radiation and probably occupied a versatile predatory role in warm coastal and shelf waters.
Its asymmetrical teeth formed an efficient slicing and gripping edge rather than the tall piercing dentition of many lamniform sharks. Small fishes and invertebrates are the most plausible prey, with the shark likely taking whatever manageable food was locally available.
The species is known mainly from isolated teeth, so its precise body form and behaviour remain uncertain. Its dentition nevertheless records an increasingly modern-looking carcharhiniform feeding style within the diverse early Eocene shark fauna.
Quick Identification
Look for: a small asymmetric requiem-shark tooth with a distally inclined cusp and an extended cutting heel; inspect the heel and cutting edges for the fine serration pattern used to separate it from triakids.
Diagnostic Features
- Lateral teeth have a low triangular cusp inclined distally.
- Distal heel is broad and forms a continuous cutting edge with the cusp.
- Fine serration is developed on parts of the cutting margin in diagnostic teeth.
- Root is broad, low and bilobed.
- Overall crown is more carcharhinid-like and cutting-adapted than the tall cusped catshark teeth.
Fossil Details
Similar Species
Recorded Fossil Sites
London Clay Formation
References
- Ebersole, J.A.; Cicimurri, D.J.; Stringer, G.L. (2019). Taxonomy and biostratigraphy of the elasmobranchs and bony fishes (Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes) of the lower-to-middle Eocene (Ypresian to Bartonian) Claiborne Group in Alabama, USA, including an analysis of otoliths. European Journal of Taxonomy, 585, 1–274 View reference
- Rayner, D.; Mitchell, T.; Rayner, M. (2009). London Clay Fossils of Kent and Essex. 228 pp.. Medway Fossil and Mineral Society, Rochester, Kent View reference
- Ward, D.J. (1980). The distribution of sharks, rays and chimaeroids in the English Palaeogene. Tertiary Research, 3(1), 13–19 View reference